I am not sure of the point you are trying to say. Isn't it a well-known fact that all policies cannot always satisfy everyone? It cannot always make everyone happy. By the way, it would be better if you provided the source of the data (the 80% one). Moreover  your examples are too extreme and narrow. And it's also ridiculous to argue that allowing telemedicine puts the vast majority of patients at risk. Don't you know that telemedicine has never been in full swing in Korea because the only reason you think about mobile phone treatment is in Korea? You cannot just interpret tele-health system as a threat just because you think it is dangerous.  The employment side is also not a problem at all. (After all, is the doctor's bowl the focus?) Opposing the introduction of telemedicine in the context you argued doesn't seem to be different from the logic of the Luddite movement. Old things give way to new ones. Rather, medical devices using artificial intelligence are only a derivative of telemedicine. Do you not know that doctors are the subject of medical practice in countries where telemedicine is developed and in advanced countries including China?