최지현 2019.10.30 14:58

Your writing was really amazing. In particular, it was impressive that we had to create a zoo where humans and animals interact.
I have a question, but I want you to elaborate on the meaning of "No Zoo for animals."
I didn't understand when i first read it.
이희주 2019.10.30 15:32

(1820 이희주)
Although I have different opinion, I think your view is so great!! I was very impressed your statement; "zoos do not exist simply for human enjoyment." Espacially, I was suprised by your opinion that zoo is good for both human and animal. However, although you have argued that zoo perserves the endagered animal, a recent survey comformed that it is for fact that only 3 out of 10 animals at the zoo are endangered animals. So, we can conclude that the main purpose of zoo is not to save the endager animals but to make financial profit out of it. Therefore, I argue that zoo runs on the economic benefits and not the perservation of the endagered animals.
이은채 2019.10.31 14:15

이희주 : [1518 이은채] Thank you for your positive assessment of my essay. I agree with you that now many zoos are not operated to protect endangered species . But my argument is that we should correct this negative situation, not that I am positive about the current zoo system.
김나영 2019.10.31 00:56

(1802 김나영) At first, when I read your essay title, I thought that you oppose the maintanence of the zoo. But it was not! I think it is a good point that you referred about the definition of a zoo. In particular, your third suggestion that how the present zoo system should be changed was very creative. And also was your descriptive style. Not the abolition or maintanence of zoo, it was the way that zoos should be changed. You said 'countless animals are crying in pain.' This sentence remained in my memory.
이은채 2019.10.31 14:19

김나영 : [1518 이은채] I'm glad you said those specific and positive things. I hope that many people are interested in this issue and the animal's environment in the zoo will improve quickly.
이지은 2019.11.01 00:43

I agree with you in part. Zoo said it benefits both animals and humans, but I don't agree with this. The zoo said that humans can get information about animals and animals can receive safe living space or be treated, but the animal is threatened in the first place by human error such as reckless development. Before you can protect animals in the zoo, you must protect their original habitat. No matter how similar an animal is to its original living space, it is worse than its original habitat.