박병진 2019.06.23 21:08

I also agree with you. I think the decision made by the WHO is just prejudice against the game. Also, as the article states, the resulting game regulations are like killing the nation's game industry. I think the harsh game regulations imposed by the Korean government are one of the contradictory and foolish ways.
황성환 2019.06.23 21:38

I think you're right. Originally, I was greatly impressed by the negative effects of game addiction, and was quite negative about game addiction, so I was in favor of treating it as a disease. But when I read your article, I thought that there might be a different idea than I thought, and that is also valid.
정상수 2019.06.24 01:45

I agree with your opinion. Playing too much games can be a problem, but it is one of those games that can relieve stress if played properly.
엄성용 2019.06.25 08:24

[한기성]
Judging game addiction as a disease,
can make only backfire.
박천호 2019.06.26 12:10

[2420 이상준] I also agree with your opinion. They only thought about some criminals who commit crime effected to game addiction. They should reconsider their decision for many game players who want to play games freely.
윤지훈 2019.06.26 13:11

[2218 윤지훈] I agree with your opinion. I think that game addiction should not be considered as a disease until the logical criteria of diagnosing the state of people is established. WHO's declaration seems to be very ambiguous and logically invalid.