유희상 2019.06.22 19:24

[2419 유희상]

I totally agree with your opinion that the standard of game addiction is not clear. However, another fact is that it is clear that 'excessive' game addiction should be treated. You're very angry about classifying game addiction as a disease, but I think you should be more angry about clarifying the "appropriate" standard for game use and the standard for game addiction, which is a "disease."
박승찬 2019.06.22 19:53

[2409 박승찬] I accept your opinion in part. However, "Lineage," as an example, can steal items if users are killed, which actually causes many disputes and fights to take place offline. So I don't think it fits the universalization error of fighting a lot. In conclusion, i think your opinion has little error. So, you should supplement your opinion.
김재익 2019.06.28 22:08

I also agree with you. For the older generation, games are now considered simple games that encourage excessive use and are easy to manipulate and thoughtless, like Chrome's dinosaur game. I don't think these older generations should be constrained by the ever-growing game industry. Gamers will have to show opposition to WHO's classification of game addiction as a disease and prove that games are not just entertainment.